Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5194
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuchemwa, Stella-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-10T07:39:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-10T07:39:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-31-
dc.identifier.issn2714-2132-
dc.identifier.issn2714-2183-
dc.identifier.uriDOI: 10.46606/eajess2020v01i01.0002-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/5194-
dc.description.abstractTeachers’ feedback has been used for centuries by students who use English as second language to improve their writing skills. This study sought to find out the students and teachers’ responses to teacher corrective feedback in composition writing among Secondary Schools in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe using parallel questionnaires for teachers and students. The study also analyzed whether there was a significant difference between teachers and students’ responses. Fifty-six teachers and 251 ‘O Level English students randomly selected from 25 secondary schools in Bulawayo were the sample of the study. Data collected from the questionnaires was analyzed through Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 10). Findings showed that there were high overall means for Feed Up, Feed Back and Feed Forward for both teachers and students who valued these response aspects although they disagreed on some aspects. Independent samples Mann-Whitney U test showed that there was a significant difference between the teachers’ and students’ responses on Feed Up and Feed Back, Sig =.000. It is only in Feed Forward that there was no significant difference in responses as shown by a Sig of .072. The study therefore recommended that teachers should always have mechanisms in place to find out whether the students have understood teachers’ feedback or not in order to assist learners accordingly as well as using such information on planning and developing useful teaching strategies. The schools administration should provide teachers with the necessary resources for them to be able to adequately and properly assist learners in the composition writing process.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAfrica Journals Onlineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEast African Journal of Education and Social Sciences [ONE-STAR rated by Journal Publishing Practices and Standards (JPPS) https://www.journalquality.info/jpps-criteria/one-star (assessed: 2021-11-09)];Vol.1, No. 1.-
dc.subjectZimbabween_US
dc.subjectComposition writingen_US
dc.subjectCorrective feedbacken_US
dc.subjectResponsesen_US
dc.subjectSecondary schoolsen_US
dc.titleDo Teachers and Students Share the Same Feedback Meaning? A Quantitative Study among Secondary Schools in Bulawayo, Zimbabween_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Do Teachers and Students Share the Same Feedback Meaning.pdfAbstact79.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

14
checked on May 2, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.