Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/660
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMhlahlo, S. R.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-14T10:10:06Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-14T10:10:06Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn1815-9036-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/660-
dc.description.abstractThe growing concern about the environment and sustainable development reveals the connections between human and physical branches of geography. The functional specialization of geographical enquiry into thematically focused fields reveals the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Such dismemberment of geographical study has resulted in a relative decline of interest in regional geography as a geographical study methodology in favour of alternative methods of enquiry. The discussion will define “region” and “regional geography,” and analyze the decline of interest in the regional concept since the mid-nineteenth century and examine the influence of industrial development to regional studies. The study critically examines the weakness of the regional geography concept that resulted in the relative decline of interest. Using secondary data, the research examines the geographical methodologies and approaches that replaced regional geography. The sample, quantitative and systematic studies, in the new geography are investigated. The investigation explores the advantages of regional geography and efforts to revive regional geography, owing to its intellectual vigour. The research concludes that alternative geographical study methodologies are not completely divorced from the regional concept.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMidlands State Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Dyke;Vol. 7, No. 2; p.14-25-
dc.subjectRegional concept, geographical methodologies, sample, quantitative,en_US
dc.subjectSystematic studies, intellectual vigouren_US
dc.titleThe relative decline of interest in regional geography as a geographical study methodology compared with alternative methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
muhla.pdf7.72 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Jul 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.