Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/4844
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTembo, Charles-
dc.contributor.authorMaganga, Allan-
dc.contributor.authorDewah, Peterson-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T08:53:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-11T08:53:33Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn2663-6670-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25159/2309-5792/3856-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/4844-
dc.description.abstractThis article presents various points of view regarding the treatment of sunken fontanelle by various communities as ignited by the controversial practice of kutara (a practice that involves the father of a child sliding his penis from the lower part of the left and right cheeks to the top of the head, as well as from the lower part of the face to the top of the head, and from the lower back part of the head to the top). The story of Alick Macheso’s use of his manhood to treat nhova (sunken fontanelle) opened a Pandora’s box. The story not only attracted the attention of critics from diverse cultural and ethical backgrounds, but revealed multi - ethnic positions. That is, reactions were steeped in a multiplicity of intellectual, religious and even cultural grounding. Reactions ranged from accusations of backwardness and absurdity, through to medical and Christian orientations toward the treatment of nhova . The overarching idea is that there is a general tendency to dismiss the age - old practice of kutara, coupled with an uncritical celebration of certain positions. The debate that ensued following publication of the story seemed to revolve around ethical considerations. The school of thought that dismisses kutara with disdain regards it as unethical and unimaginable in the present - day world — it is redolent with insinuations of absurdity on the part of those that live and celebrate it. We contend that the raging debate that followed the publication of the story can best be conceptualised within the context of African ethics. We note that kutara has relevance to the spirituality, ethical values, privacy, and protection of children’s rights, among other ethical issues. It is hoped that the article will stir further debate and encourage more research among information practitioners, scholars and researchers into the ethical issues surrounding the treatment of sunken fontanelle in various African communities. It argues for an Afrocentric conceptualisation of phenomena in order to contribute to debates on the renaissance of African cultures, and stresses that it is imperative to harness the life - furthering age - old traditions in African ontological existence.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUnisa Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOral History Journal of South Africa;Vol. 7; No. 1-
dc.subjectAfrican ethicsen_US
dc.subjectHuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous knowledge systemen_US
dc.titleUtilising indigenous knowledge or crime against humanity?: a critical engagement with the debate generated by Alick Macheso's Use of Manhood to Treat Nhova (Sunken Fontanelle)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

6
checked on Jul 26, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Jul 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.