Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/4795
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMatsa, Mark-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T14:05:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-01T14:05:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-92827-2-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-319-92828-9-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92828-9_16-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92828-9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/4795-
dc.description.abstractThe minority Tonga Community of the Great Zambezi River Basin (Basilwizi) in Binga District of north-western Zimbabwe suffers a double tragedy which threatens peoples’ livelihoods. First, they were forcibly displaced from the resource-rich flood plain of the Zambezi River to the dry, marginal escarpments of the same river to facilitate the construction of the Kariba Dam in the late 1950s. The same community is now suffering from the impacts of climate change and variability which have rendered their environment even drier and less productive. In spite of this, and with little outside assistance, this subsistence, semi-pastoral community seems determined to prevail. This study assesses the relationship between climate and environmental change in the context of Tonga minority rural community development. Interviews and questionnaires were used to collect qualitative data from Tonga elders and other key informants in the district. Direct observations were used to identify in-situ environmental changes and coping strategies used to ameliorate the effects of climate change and variability. Results show that although the Tonga community is getting some assistance from NGOs and the central government, the assistance is not sustainable partly because it doesn’t incorporate Tonga traditional knowledge systems which have been the bedrock of Tonga Community resilience for generations. This study posits that for meaningful climate-compatible development to take place in Binga, a community derived development ‘basket of priorities’ be used as a basis for sustainable community development. An identify-define-initiate-lead (IDIL) and a protect-empower-capacitate-facilitate (PECF) model is thus suggested to help the Tonga community cope with climate change impacts more sustainably.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Chamen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHuman and Environmental Security in the Era of Global Risks: Behnassi, M., Gupta, H., Pollmann, O. (eds);Chapter 16: p. 317-339-
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectBasilwizien_US
dc.subjectTonga communityen_US
dc.subjectZambezi riveren_US
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten_US
dc.titleClimate change and Tonga community development: thinking from the peripheryen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeBook chapter-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Book Chapters
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Document1.pdfAbstract62.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Download(s)

8
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.