Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/4351
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHassaballa, Ithar-
dc.contributor.authorFawcett, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorSepers, Charles-
dc.contributor.authorReed, Florence DiGennaro-
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Jerry-
dc.contributor.authorMunodawafa, Davison-
dc.contributor.authorPhori, Peter M-
dc.contributor.authorChiriseri, Ephraim-
dc.contributor.authorKouadio, Koffi-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T12:14:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-03T12:14:24Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn1541-3519-
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0272684X19846742-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/4351-
dc.description.abstractTo address the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund led a multilevel and multisectoral intervention known as the Ebola response effort. Although surveillance systems were able to detect reduction in Ebola incidence, there was little understanding of the implemented activities within affected areas. To address this gap, this empirical case study examined (a) implementation of Ebola response activities and associated bending the curve of incidence of Ebola virus disease and (b) candidate factors associated with fuller implementation of the Ebola response effort. A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods were used to address these questions. A participatory monitoring and evaluation system was used to capture, code, characterize, and communicate nearly a hundred Ebola response activities implemented in Lofa County, a highly affected area in Liberia. The Ebola response effort was enabled by community engagement and collaboration across different sectors. Results showed fuller implementation corresponded with a marked reduction in Ebola virus disease. This report concludes with a discussion of how monitoring and evaluation can strengthen implementation of activities needed to address disease outbreaks.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Quarterly of Community Health Education;Vol.40 ; No.1:p.57-66-
dc.subjectEbolaen_US
dc.subjectparticipatory evaluationen_US
dc.subjectLiberiaen_US
dc.subjectLofa Countyen_US
dc.titleParticipatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Ebola Response Activities in Lofa County, Liberia: Some Lessons Learneden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ithar.pdfAbstract73.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Download(s)

16
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.