Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/4220
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMugabe, Francis T.
dc.contributor.authorHodnett, M.
dc.contributor.authorSenzanje, A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T13:35:33Z
dc.date.available2021-05-20T13:35:33Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn0140-1963
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140196306004174
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.11.016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/4220
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes and compares the hydrological responses of runoff, soil moisture and groundwater levels to rainfall events for two small semi-arid catchments over a 2-year period. Romwe received 1430 and 756 mm of rainfall in the 19999/00 and 2000/01 season, respectively. Mutangi received 756 and 615 mm of rainfall in the same years. Romwe generated 520 and 102 mm of runoff in the 19999/00 and 2000/01 seasons, respectively, while Mutangi generated 82 and 69 mm of runoff in the same years. The runoff response of the catchments was dominated by a relatively quick response to rainfall and with little or no significant contribution from regional groundwater or ‘old water’ sources. Total soil moisture storage to a depth of 120 cm was higher at Romwe than Mutangi for the entire study period reflecting the differences in the soil types. The groundwater level was closer to the surface and responded more quickly to rainfall at Romwe compared to Mutangi where water levels were between 12 and 16 m below the surface. There was a significant relationship between profile soil moisture and water table level at Romwe and none was observed at all in Mutangi. Significant (p<0.05) monthly rainfall runoff relationships were observed at both Romwe and Mutangi. At Romwe and Mutangi 91% and 76% of the runoff variation was accounted for by rainfall in the 1999/00 season, respectively. The rainfall–runoff relationship were different at Romwe for the two seasons, it was higher in the 1999/00 season than the 2000/01 season when 91% and 49% of the runoff variation was due to rainfall, respectively. The relationships were almost similar at Mutangi during the two seasons.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Arid Environments;Vol. 69; No. 4: p. 599-616
dc.subjectSemi-ariden_US
dc.subjectCatchment hydrologyen_US
dc.subjectSoil moistureen_US
dc.subjectWater tableen_US
dc.subjectRunoffen_US
dc.titleComparative hydrological behaviour of two small catchments in semi-arid Zimbabween_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Document1.pdfAbstract63.4 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.