Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1161
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Clercq, E. M.-
dc.contributor.authorVanwambeke, S. O.-
dc.contributor.authorSungirai, Marvelous-
dc.contributor.authorAdehan, S.-
dc.contributor.authorLokossou, R.-
dc.contributor.authorMadder, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-02T11:31:37Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-02T11:31:37Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn0168-8162-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marvelous_Sungirai/publication/225296761_Geographic_distribution_of_the_invasive_cattle_tick_Rhipicephalus_microplus_a_country-wide_survey_in_Benin/links/55e0455308aede0b572cc381.pdf-
dc.description.abstractThe cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus is currently invading the West African region, and little information is available on the spread of this exotic tick in this region. We set out a country-wide field survey to determine its current distribution in Benin. Ticks were collected on cattle from 106 farms selected by random sampling covering all regions of the country. Rhipicephalus annulatus was found on 70 % of all farms, R. decoloratus on 42 %, R. geigyi on 58 %, and R. microplus on 49 %. There is a clear geographic separation between the indigenous Rhipicephalus species and R. microplus. Rhipicephalus annulatus occurs mainly in the northern departments, but it was also observed in lower numbers in locations in the south. The presence of R. decoloratus is limited to the northern region, and in most locations, this tick makes up a small proportion of the collected ticks. The tick R. geigyi tends to be dominant, but occurs only in the four northern departments. The observations concerning R. microplus are entirely different, this species occurs in the southern and central region. The results of this survey confirm the invasive character and displacement properties of R. microplus, since in less than a decade it has colonized more than half of the country and has displaced indigenous ticks of the same genus in many of the sampled locations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science+Business Media B.Ven_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesExperimental and Applied Acarology;Vol. 58, No. 4, p. 441-452-
dc.subjectRhipicephalus microplus, Babesia bovisen_US
dc.subjectGeographic tick distribution, Country-wide tick survey Cattleen_US
dc.titleGeographic distribution of the invasive cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus, a country-wide survey in Beninen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on Jul 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.