Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6114
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSonja Maria Leitneren_US
dc.contributor.authorVictoria Carbonellen_US
dc.contributor.authorRangarirayi Lucia Mhinduen_US
dc.contributor.authorYuhao Zhuen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul Mutuoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKlaus Butterbach-Bahlen_US
dc.contributor.authorLutz Merbolden_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-09T12:25:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-09T12:25:34Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/6114-
dc.description.abstractExtensive livestock production in pastoral areas supports millions of livestock keepers in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, it is also linked to environmental externalities such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Corralling of livestock overnight in fenced enclosures (“bomas” in Kiswahili) is common to protect animals from theft and predation and is practiced across SSA. Boma manure is usually not removed and accumulates over years, making bomas GHG emission hotspots. The following study presents the first full year of CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions measurements from cattle bomas in a savanna ecosystem in Kenya, comparing active (in use) and inactive (i.e., abandoned) bomas. Active bomas were used for 1–3 months before being abandoned and cattle were moved to a new boma. GHG emissions were measured using static chambers inside three replicate bomas and along three 100 m transects from bomas into undisturbed savanna. Compared to savanna background fluxes, it was found that GHG flux rates from bomas were elevated by several orders of magnitude, with mean fluxes of 487 ± 8 mg CO2-C m 2 h 1, 325 ± 11 μg N2O-N m 2 h 1, and 3245 ± 234 μg CH4-C m 2 h 1 for active bomas, and 167 ± 52 mg CO2-C m 2 h 1, 610 ± 186 μg N2O-N m 2 h 1, and 3127 ± 1262 μg CH4-C m 2 h 1 for inactive bomas, while surrounding savanna soils only emitted 22.3 ± 18.2 mg CO2-C m 2 h 1, 2.5 ± 2.2 μg N2O-N m 2 h 1, and 0.1 ± 0.7 μg CH4-C m 2 h 1. Assuming that bomas are used for 45 days per year, annual manure emission factors were 2.43 ± 0.42%N for N2O and 0.49 ± 0.07%C for CH4, which corresponds to 2.64 ± 0.37 g CH4 kg 1 volatile solids (VS). These emission factors were similar to IPCC default values for feedlots for low- producing cattle in warm climates; however, the IPCC only considers emissions in year when bomas are in use and does not account for emissions following boma abandonment. At the farm scale, boma manure contributed little (2.2%) to total CH4 emissions, which were dominated by enteric CH4 emissions (97.6%); but bomas were a substantial source for N2O, contributing over 32% to total N2O emissions on the farm. This calls for the inclusion of active and inactive bomas in the activity data collection for national GHG inventories, as bomas are currently overlooked hotspots for GHG emissions that are not represented in the GHG budgets of African nations. To mitigate GHG emissions, manure should be removed regularly and used as fertilizer to return nu- trients to the grassland, preventing nutrient mining and ensuring long-term rangeland productivity and resil- ience, or it might be used to grow crops and livestock feeds.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relationThis study was supported financially by the CGIAR Initiatives Live- stock and Climate and Mitigate+: Low-Emission Food Systems, which are supported by contributors to the CGIAR Trust Fund, as well as by the European Union through the EU-DeSIRA ESSA project (Earth observa- tion and environmental sensing for climate-smart sustainable agro- pastoralism ecosystem transformation in East Africa)en_US
dc.relationSML and YZ further acknowl- edge funding for this project received by the New Zealand Government to support the objectives of the Livestock Research Group of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases.en_US
dc.relationLM acknowledges funding received from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Programme for the project "Knowl- edge and climate services from an African observation and Data research Infrastructure (KADI)".en_US
dc.relationKBB received additional funding via the Pioneer Center for Research in Sustainable Agricultural Futures (Land-CRAFT), DNRFen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environmenten_US
dc.subjectMethaneen_US
dc.subjectNitrous oxideen_US
dc.subjectBomaen_US
dc.subjectManureen_US
dc.titleGreenhouse gas emissions from cattle enclosures in semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa: The case of a rangeland in South-Central Kenyaen_US
dc.typeresearch articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.108980-
dc.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Mazingira Centre for Environmental Research and Education, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenyaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Mazingira Centre for Environmental Research and Education, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya; ETH Zurich, Department of Environmental System Sciences, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitaetsstrasse 2, Zurich 8092, Switzerland; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germanyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Mazingira Centre for Environmental Research and Education, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya; Midlands State University, Department for Land and Water Resources Management, P Bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabween_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Mazingira Centre for Environmental Research and Education, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenyaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Mazingira Centre for Environmental Research and Education, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenyaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany; Pioneer Center Land-CRAFT, Department of Agroecology, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmarken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationAgroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Integrative Agroecology Group, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Zurich 8046, Switzerlanden_US
dc.relation.issn1873-2305en_US
dc.description.volume367en_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage16en_US
dc.relation.grantnogrant agreement number 101058525en_US
dc.relation.grantnogrant number P2.en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetyperesearch article-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle enclosures in semi-arid sub Saharan Africa.pdfFull-Text6.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

108
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.