Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5455
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPayidamoyo Nyokaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMary Temboen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T13:17:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-22T13:17:22Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/5455-
dc.description.abstractUsing a qualitative research approach, this study provides an inquiry into the nature of democracy and digital political activism discourses on @Hopewell Chin’ono and @Jacob Ngarivhume prior to the 31st July demonstrations. Alternative communications spaces have revolutionised political communication in Zimbabwe. In Zimbabwe, political polarisation has created a monolithic voice in the mainstream media. In the “Second Republic”, digital activism is a growing phenomenon where subalterns question the state. This study is guided by Manuel Castells’ Power and Counter Power Theory. Data gathered using netnography was analysed using critical discourse analysis. Findings show that digital activism has turned into social media “dissidence”, calling for the resignation of the government officials including the Executive through 31st demonstrations. There is an intimate relationship between digital democracy and digital activism, enabling political advocacy and lobbying. Twitter is used to safeguard the lives of activists. Religious discourses were used by both Jacob Ngarivhume and Hopewell Chin’ono as they drummed up support for the July 31st demonstrations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCogent Social Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectDemocracyen_US
dc.subjectDigital activismen_US
dc.subjectHopewell Chin’onoen_US
dc.subjectJacob Ngarivhumeen_US
dc.subject31st demonstrationsen_US
dc.subjectSocial mediaen_US
dc.titleDimensions of democracy and digital political activism on Hopewell Chin’ono and Jacob Ngarivhume Twitter accounts towards the July 31st demonstrations in Zimbabween_US
dc.typeresearch articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.2024350-
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Media and Society Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabween_US
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Media and Society Studies, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabween_US
dc.relation.issn2331-1886en_US
dc.description.volume8en_US
dc.description.issue1en_US
dc.description.startpage1en_US
dc.description.endpage22en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetyperesearch article-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dimensions of democracy and digital political activism .pdfAbstract262.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

84
checked on May 5, 2024

Download(s)

28
checked on May 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.