Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/4771
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZilundu, Prince L. M.-
dc.contributor.authorChibhabha, Fidelis-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Guangyin-
dc.contributor.authorFu, Rao-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Li-Hua-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T12:08:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-25T12:08:46Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1935-9772-
dc.identifier.issn1935-9780-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2070-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/4771-
dc.description.abstractMedical students' motivation and study strategies are crucial in determining academic performance. This study aimed to assess the motivation and learning strategies of medical students as well as their association with performance in anatomy examinations. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, two focus group discussions, and students' current anatomy cumulative grade point average (cGPA) were used. Generally, the medical students strongly felt that anatomy is fundamental to the practice of medicine and surgery. This result was consistent with high task value scores of 5.99 ± 1.25. They were also driven by extrinsic goal orientation (5.59 ± 1.42) and intrinsic goal orientation (5.08 ± 1.26). Most medical students typically relied on elaboration (5.35 ± 1.25) ahead of other cognitive strategies namely rehearsal (5.30 ± 1.11), organization (5.15 ± 1.34), and lowest-rated critical thinking (4.77 ± 1.19). The students also relied on resource management strategies, effort regulation (5.15 ± 1.20) and time and study environment regulation (5.03 ± 1.03) more than the moderately scored peer learning (4.95 ± 1.50) and help-seeking (4.95 ± 1.09). In the focus group discussions, students reported that they often narrate or explain to each other what they would have read and understood from anatomy lectures, tutorials, and textbooks. They also bemoaned the lack of institutional support for stress burdens. The motivation and learning strategies subscales were not correlated with anatomy cGPA. Males were driven by extrinsic goals and experienced significantly higher levels of test anxiety than females (P < 0.05). Knowing the motivation and learning strategies students employ early in the medical curriculum can be leveraged to promote self-directed learning and academic achievement.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnatomical Sciences Education;-
dc.subjectZimbabween_US
dc.subjectAcademic performanceen_US
dc.subjectGross anatomyen_US
dc.subjectMedical educationen_US
dc.titlePre-clinical medical students' use of motivational and cognitive study strategies during anatomy learning: a three-year cross-sectional surveyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Document1.pdfAbstract66.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.