Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/4706
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuposhi, Asphat-
dc.contributor.authorMpinganjira, Mercy-
dc.contributor.authorWait, Marius-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T08:52:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-17T08:52:58Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn0734-242X-
dc.identifier.issn1096-3669-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X211003965-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/4706-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the ban on plastic bags is gaining in prominence as a policy option to manage plastic bag litter, there are mixed views on its rationale and effectiveness. This study employs a systematic literature review to understand considerations, benefits and unintended consequences of banning plastic bags. The review’s results pointed to the limited success of a plastic bag ban owing to lack of suitable alternatives, limited state capacity to monitor and enforce the ban, thriving black market, structural and instrumental power of the plastic industry. The power of the industry was manifested by the covert practice of deflecting accountability to consumers by focusing on business-oriented solutions, including an inclination towards self-regulation. The findings of this study underscored the need for a global treaty to address the transient nature of plastic bag litter and moving away from the symbolic gesture of targeting only plastic shopping bags but considering the environmental impact of all forms of plastic such as straws, foamed plastics, plastic bottles and caps. There is a general consensus in literature that the end of plastic shopping bags is not nigh due to their utilitarian benefits. This study therefore recommends the promotion of a circular economy focusing on ecological modernisation, sustainable plastic bag manufacturing and recovery strategies such as recycling as a long-term strategy. A significant strand of literature reviewed also recommends the adoption of community-driven approaches such as voluntary initiatives as opposed to a plastic bag ban as they proved to be effective in promoting environmental citizenship behaviours in countries such as Finland.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWaste Management and Research;-
dc.subjectPlastic bag banen_US
dc.subjectPlastic bag governanceen_US
dc.subjectCircular economyen_US
dc.subjectSystematic literature reviewen_US
dc.titleConsiderations, benefits and unintended consequences of banning plastic shopping bags for environmental sustainability: A systematic literature reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Considerations, benefits.pdfFull Text500.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

74
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Download(s)

46
checked on Nov 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.