Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/4504
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOjakorotu, Victoren_US
dc.contributor.authorKamidza, Rumbidzaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-12T09:02:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-12T09:02:57Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn974-9284-
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0974928417749642-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11408/4504-
dc.description.abstractThis article maps the evolution of Zimbabwe’s Look East Policy (LEP) and specifically the bilateral relationship with China through the lens of Zimbabwe’s domestic politics. It argues that political elite in Zimbabwe has a vested interest in a close economic and political relationship with China at the cost of the interests of the people of Zimbabwe. The author establishes that Zimbabwe’s LEP was intended to respond to the economic sanctions imposed on it by Western nations. From the descriptive account of the LEP provided in the article, it appears that the LEP has been successful in doing that by having a broad-based economic and political relationship with China. The author further critiques the impact of Chinese investment in Zimbabwe as detrimental to the interests of the people. Foreign policy is an instrument that governs and protects the interests of governments, nationals, institutions, organisations and entities within the lenses of bilateral relations between the countries concerned. The Zimbabwe–China relations point to the fact that the latter China is politically and economically committed to engage and develop the former. However, at the heart of commitment and development in Zimbabwe lies questions of interests and the nature of the relationship which is affecting development and commitment to take place. Hence, this article argues that the failure of Zimbabwe to yield satisfying results from the bilateral relations lies mostly on the political and economic weaknesses of the Zimbabwean government and leadership. The fact that the LEP is not formally and publicly developed and disseminated to key stakeholders and the general public and that it remains largely an oral secret public policy statement affects the interests of Zimbabwean economy and interested stakeholders. This also reflects a weak foreign policy directive. As long as Zimbabwe continues to deny to engage with other superpowers and global institutions, the LEP will remain doomed as China will continue to manipulate and exploit the relationship knowingly that Zimbabwe has no other friends and partners for development and cooperation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIndia Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs ,Vol.74, Iss.1;-
dc.subjectBilateral relationsen_US
dc.subjectLook East policyen_US
dc.subjectforeign policyen_US
dc.subjectdevelopmenten_US
dc.titleLook East Policy:  The Case of Zimbabwe–China Political and Economic Relations Since 2000en_US
dc.typetexten_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypetext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
KAMIDZA.pdfArticle660.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

104
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Download(s)

42
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.