Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1265
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMatunhu, Jephias-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-08T13:45:58Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-08T13:45:58Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn2141-6672-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1381858116_Matunhu.pdf-
dc.description.abstractThe way states and development specialists rationalize how to commit economic resources to development is influenced, to a greater extent by their level of persuasion towards specific development theories. The discourse assesses the influence of modernization and dependency theories on Africa’s development. The conclusion is that both theories have failed to help develop Africa. The discourse pins hope on the African Renaissance theory of development.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Journalsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAfrican Journal of History and Culture;Vol. 3(5), p. 65-72,-
dc.subjectModernization, dependency, rural underdevelopment,en_US
dc.subjectAfrican renaissance.en_US
dc.titleA critique of modernization and dependency theories in Africa: critical assessmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Matunhu pdf - article1381858116_Matunhu.pdf271.57 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on May 19, 2024

Download(s)

10
checked on May 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.