Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1206
Title: | Comparisons of sugar blend 1 plus fertilizer over straight fertilizer as basal application on growth and yield of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L). | Authors: | Chandiposha, Misheck Kunedzimwe, Ngonidzashe Gwazane, Munyaradzi Chiriman’ombe, Daniel |
Keywords: | Sugarcane, Sugar blend, Straight fertilizer, Sugarcane varieties | Issue Date: | 2014 | Publisher: | INNSPUB | Series/Report no.: | International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR);Vol. 4, No. 4:,89-93 | Abstract: | An investigation to compare sugar blend 1 plus with straight fertilizers (single super phosphate and muriate of potash) as basal fertilizer was carried out at Hippo Valley Estates in the 2012/13 growing season.A 2x3 factorial experiment in a Randomised Complete Block Design with 3 replications was used. The first factor was fertilizer type which consisted of two levels, sugar blend 1 plus and straight fertilizer and the second factor was variety with the following levels N14, Zn10 and Nco376.The results showed that there was no interaction (p<0.05) between fertilizer type and variety on number of sugarcane tillers, stalks, sugarcane height and yield. However, there was significant difference (p< 0.05) between the fertilizer types on number of sugarcane tillers, stalks, sugarcane height and yield. Also varieties had significant difference on yield. Sugar blend 1 plus fertilizer increased the number of tillers, primary stalks, cane height and yield when compared to straight fertilizer. The cane yield in treatments applied sugar blend 1 plus increased by 24% when compared to use of straight fertilizer, from 87.2 to 108.4 tonnes / hectare. | URI: | https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/33473468 | ISSN: | 2223-7054 |
Appears in Collections: | Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
An investigation to compare sugar blend 1 plus with straight fertilizers.pdf | Abstract | 120.56 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
116
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Download(s)
14
checked on Nov 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in MSUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.