<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/231">
    <title>MSUIR Collection:</title>
    <link>https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/231</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1063" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-04-20T16:53:01Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1063">
    <title>Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process</title>
    <link>https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1063</link>
    <description>Title: Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process
Authors: Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.
Abstract: This paper explores through a neoliberal lens the implications of Kruger National Park‟s (KNP)&#xD;
“Commercialisation for conservation process” (hereafter the commercialisation process, for brevity‟s sake) that was launched in 2000. In doing so, the paper answers a clarion call for empirical research in&#xD;
this under-researched area of tourism-protected area partnerships in particular (Wilson, Nielsen &amp;&#xD;
Buultjens, 2009) and the broader neoliberalisation of nature literature in general (Castree 2008a,&#xD;
2008b; Himley, 2008). Note that the paucity of empirical studies of neoliberalisation globally (Heynen,&#xD;
McCarthy, Prudham, &amp; Robbins, 2007) partially accounts for the existing hegemony of neoliberal&#xD;
development orthodox (King, 2009).</description>
    <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.</dc:creator>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

