<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>MSUIR Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/231" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/231</id>
  <updated>2026-04-20T16:53:01Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-20T16:53:01Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1063" />
    <author>
      <name>Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://cris.library.msu.ac.zw//handle/11408/1063</id>
    <updated>2022-06-27T13:49:05Z</updated>
    <published>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Winners and losers: local perceptions of Kruger National Park's commercialisation process
Authors: Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.
Abstract: This paper explores through a neoliberal lens the implications of Kruger National Park‟s (KNP)&#xD;
“Commercialisation for conservation process” (hereafter the commercialisation process, for brevity‟s sake) that was launched in 2000. In doing so, the paper answers a clarion call for empirical research in&#xD;
this under-researched area of tourism-protected area partnerships in particular (Wilson, Nielsen &amp;&#xD;
Buultjens, 2009) and the broader neoliberalisation of nature literature in general (Castree 2008a,&#xD;
2008b; Himley, 2008). Note that the paucity of empirical studies of neoliberalisation globally (Heynen,&#xD;
McCarthy, Prudham, &amp; Robbins, 2007) partially accounts for the existing hegemony of neoliberal&#xD;
development orthodox (King, 2009).</summary>
    <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Nyahunzvi, Dzingai K.</dc:creator>
  </entry>
</feed>

